Translation of the original article by Marcel Keppler
In a press release dated August 1st, 2021 witnesses are asked to step forward to testify in front of the International Criminal Court in The Hague for a criminal complaint.
It is mandatory for the witness statement to be written in English language.
The current call is primarily regarding the topic of “vaccination”, it´s associated damage to the health of individuals and medical informed consent.
In addition, other forms of psychological torture also play a significant role, which many of those affected are unlikely to be aware of in detail.
The guilty should be held accountable
„The human rights defender (according to UN Resolution 53⁄144) Sarah Luzia Hassel-Reusing is preparing a criminal complaint before the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague for applying the shock doctrine under the pretext of Corona. The complaint relates to measures that have reached the severity of a crime against humanity (Article 7 of the Rome Statute).
Civilians are harmed within the framework of a large-scale and systematic policy through the criminal offenses of murder (lit. a), imprisonment or other serious deprivation of liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law (lit.e), torture (lit.f), persecution (lit. h ) and other inhumane acts of a similar nature that willfully cause great suffering or serious injuries to the body or to mental or physical health (lit. k). These shock measures serve power, ideology and profit interests of different circles, which overlap.
Meanwhile, the worldwide Corona campaign has claimed countless victims of the so-called „vaccination“. The crime against humanity needs to be investigated and the guilty parties held accountable. You can contribute with your testimony. With this lawsuit, victims can get a voice and save the lives of other people, including the lives of children as of late.
We need the witness statements including name, address, date of birth and signature. The statement must include explicitly consent and permission for use in this criminal complaint which will be submitted to the ICC for crimes against humanity caused by the corona shock measures.
The witness statements should be based on the following questions:
-When did you receive which mRNA / DNA substance (“vaccine”) against Sars-CoV 2 and from which pharmaceutical company?
-Which serious and / or persistent side effects have you had that did not occur before the vaccination?
-Please provide evidence of this damage to your health with a certificate from your doctor.
-What were the consequences of this damage to your health?
-Have you been pressured to take the medical procedure? If so, who did it and in what way?
- To what extent are you informed about the experimental and genetically manipulating character of mRNA / DNA substances?
The witness statements must be in English. Please send the signed document as soon as possible to:
Sarah Luzia Hassel-Reusing
Human rights defender according to UN resolution 53⁄144
42283 Wuppertal (Germany)
Detailed interview in the corona investigation committee
As early as December 2020, further details on the planned criminal complaint were presented to the corona investigation committee (Corona-Untersuchungsausschuß). Reusing was seen live in conversation with lawyers Viviane Fischer and Dr. Füllmich.
In particular, she explained which criminal offenses of international criminal law she sees realized through the corona measures. The interview goes on to explain what so-called “white torture” is all about and which shock measures could be used to implement behavioural changes in society. One of the essential characteristics of white torture is that it is often difficult to detect and those affected often do not even perceive it as such.
The prohibition of torture applies without exception
In his 2009 article on “White Torture” in the “Psychological Review” (Psychologische Rundschau), the now retired Professor for General Psychology at the University of Kiel, Prof. Dr. Rainer Mausfeld, writes:
“Through the total instrumentalization of a person as a means of the state brought about by torture, the dignity and autonomy of the victim is violated or destroyed to such an extent that the legal possibility of such a situation alone would undermine the foundations of the rule of law. The absolute status of the prohibition of torture cannot be called into question within, but only at the expense of the democratic constitutional state. The absolute prohibition of torture separates democratic constitutional states from totalitarian regimes, in whose legal system and rulership torture is widespread. Torture thus represents an attack on a legal asset that is not relative, but absolutely worthy of protection. The prohibition of torture does not allow any exceptions – not even in the case of a public emergency that threatens the life of the nation – and basically excludes any balancing with other legal interests. „
Mausfeld illustrates in his article, among other things, the planned use of white torture in Guantánamo, Abu Ghraib and Bagram.
What does the Rome Statute say?
According to Article 7 Paragraph 1 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court of July 17, 1998, the following applies especially:
Crimes against humanity
1. For the purpose of this Statute, „crime against humanity“ means any of the following acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack:
(d) Deportation or forcible transfer of population;
(e) Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law;
(g) Rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity;
(h) Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender as defined in paragraph 3, or other grounds that are universally recognized as impermissible under international law, in connection with any act referred to in this paragraph or any crime within the jurisdiction of the Court;
(i) Enforced disappearance of persons;
(j) The crime of apartheid;
(k) Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health.“ 
There are many examples of crimes against humanity
In addition to the currently particularly present topic of compulsory vaccination through the back door, the Corona investigative committee (Corona-Untersuchungsausschuss) also elaborated on other possible criminal offenses for crimes against humanity, such as deprivation of personal freedom due to lockdowns and quarantine measures, damage to health due to postponed operations, discrimination against social groups (e.g. persecution of Doctors who have issued mask certificates), psychological torture (e.g. childbirth or school lessons only with mask wearing, perception monopoly, threat of job loss or death) and other serious restrictions on fundamental rights.
 https://t.me/HolgerFischerRA/2319 , zuletzt aufgerufen am 06.10.2021
 „Psychologie, ‚weiße Folter‘ und die Verantwortlichkeit von Wissenschaftlern“ in „Psychologische Rundschau“, 60 (4), S. 229–240, hier S.230. See under http://www.uni-kiel.de/psychologie/psychophysik/mausfeld/Mausfeld_Psychologie%20%27weisse%20Folter%27%20und%20die%20Verantwortlichkeit%20von%20Wissenschaftlern_2009.pdf , last time called up 06.10.2021
 Cour Pénale Internationale / International Criminal „Court Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court“ at „icc-cp.int“. See under https://www.icc-cpi.int/resource-library/documents/rs-eng.pdf, last time called up 09.10.2021
 See under https://2020news.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Formular_fuer_Strafanzeige.docx
 See under https://2020news.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/081120-fragen-fuer-zeugen‑2.pdf
 See under https://odysee.com/@Weltfrieden.TV:c/DenHaag_Verbrechen_gegen_Menschlichkeit:1