Cri­mi­nal com­plaint to the Inter­na­tio­nal Cri­mi­nal Court (ICC) against Coro­na Shock Mea­su­res being pre­pared – wit­nesses nee­ded to testi­fy on „vac­ci­na­ti­on“

Trans­la­ti­on of the ori­gi­nal artic­le by Mar­cel Keppler

In a press release dated August 1st, 2021[1] wit­nesses are asked to step for­ward to testi­fy in front of the Inter­na­tio­nal Cri­mi­nal Court in The Hague for a cri­mi­nal com­plaint.

It is man­da­to­ry for the wit­ness state­ment to be writ­ten in Eng­lish language.

The cur­rent call is pri­ma­ri­ly regar­ding the topic of “vac­ci­na­ti­on”, it´s asso­cia­ted dama­ge to the health of indi­vi­du­als and medi­cal infor­med consent.

In addi­ti­on, other forms of psy­cho­lo­gi­cal tor­tu­re also play a signi­fi­cant role, which many of tho­se affec­ted are unli­kely to be awa­re of in detail.

© 2021-05-22 Cri­ti­cal News – wei­ße Fol­ter beim Ein­kau­fen in Lüneburg

The guil­ty should be held accountable

„The human rights defen­der (accor­ding to UN Reso­lu­ti­on 53⁄144) Sarah Luzia Has­sel-Reu­sing is pre­pa­ring a cri­mi­nal com­plaint befo­re the Inter­na­tio­nal Cri­mi­nal Court (ICC) in The Hague for app­ly­ing the shock doc­tri­ne under the pre­text of Coro­na. The com­plaint rela­tes to mea­su­res that have rea­ched the seve­ri­ty of a crime against huma­ni­ty (Artic­le 7 of the Rome Statute).

Civi­li­ans are har­med within the frame­work of a lar­ge-sca­le and sys­te­ma­tic poli­cy through the cri­mi­nal offen­ses of mur­der (lit. a), impri­son­ment or other serious depri­va­ti­on of liber­ty in vio­la­ti­on of fun­da­men­tal rules of inter­na­tio­nal law (lit.e), tor­tu­re (lit.f), per­se­cu­ti­on (lit. h ) and other inhu­ma­ne acts of a simi­lar natu­re that willful­ly cau­se gre­at suf­fe­ring or serious inju­ries to the body or to men­tal or phy­si­cal health (lit. k). The­se shock mea­su­res ser­ve power, ideo­lo­gy and pro­fit inte­rests of dif­fe­rent cir­cles, which overlap.

Mean­while, the world­wi­de Coro­na cam­paign has clai­med count­less vic­tims of the so-cal­led „vac­ci­na­ti­on“. The crime against huma­ni­ty needs to be inves­ti­ga­ted and the guil­ty par­ties held accoun­ta­ble. You can con­tri­bu­te with your tes­tim­o­ny. With this lawsu­it, vic­tims can get a voice and save the lives of other peo­p­le, inclu­ding the lives of child­ren as of late.

We need the wit­ness state­ments inclu­ding name, address, date of birth and signa­tu­re. The state­ment must include expli­cit­ly con­sent and per­mis­si­on for use in this cri­mi­nal com­plaint which will be sub­mit­ted to the ICC for cri­mes against huma­ni­ty cau­sed by the coro­na shock measures.

The wit­ness state­ments should be based on the fol­lo­wing questions:

-When did you recei­ve which mRNA / DNA sub­s­tance (“vac­ci­ne”) against Sars-CoV 2 and from which phar­maceu­ti­cal company?

-Which serious and / or per­sis­tent side effects have you had that did not occur befo­re the vaccination?

-Plea­se pro­vi­de evi­dence of this dama­ge to your health with a cer­ti­fi­ca­te from your doctor.

-What were the con­se­quen­ces of this dama­ge to your health?

-Have you been pres­su­red to take the medi­cal pro­ce­du­re? If so, who did it and in what way?

- To what ext­ent are you infor­med about the expe­ri­men­tal and gene­ti­cal­ly mani­pu­la­ting cha­rac­ter of mRNA / DNA substances?

The wit­ness state­ments must be in Eng­lish. Plea­se send the signed docu­ment as soon as pos­si­ble to:

Sarah Luzia Hassel-Reusing

Human rights defen­der accor­ding to UN reso­lu­ti­on 53⁄144

Thor­ner­stras­se 7th

42283 Wup­per­tal (Ger­ma­ny)

+49/202/2502621 “

Detail­ed inter­view in the coro­na inves­ti­ga­ti­on committee

As ear­ly as Decem­ber 2020, fur­ther details on the plan­ned cri­mi­nal com­plaint were pre­sen­ted to the coro­na inves­ti­ga­ti­on com­mit­tee (Coro­na-Unter­su­chungs­aus­schuß). Reu­sing was seen live in con­ver­sa­ti­on with lawy­ers Vivia­ne Fischer and Dr. Füll­mich.

In par­ti­cu­lar, she explai­ned which cri­mi­nal offen­ses of inter­na­tio­nal cri­mi­nal law she sees rea­li­zed through the coro­na mea­su­res. The inter­view goes on to explain what so-cal­led “white tor­tu­re” is all about and which shock mea­su­res could be used to imple­ment beha­viou­ral chan­ges in socie­ty. One of the essen­ti­al cha­rac­te­ristics of white tor­tu­re is that it is often dif­fi­cult to detect and tho­se affec­ted often do not even per­cei­ve it as such.

The pro­hi­bi­ti­on of tor­tu­re appli­es wit­hout exception

In his 2009 artic­le on “White Tor­tu­re” in the “Psy­cho­lo­gi­cal Review” (Psy­cho­lo­gi­sche Rund­schau), the now reti­red Pro­fes­sor for Gene­ral Psy­cho­lo­gy at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Kiel, Prof. Dr. Rai­ner Maus­feld, wri­tes:

“Through the total instru­men­ta­liza­ti­on of a per­son as a means of the sta­te brought about by tor­tu­re, the digni­ty and auto­no­my of the vic­tim is vio­la­ted or des­troy­ed to such an ext­ent that the legal pos­si­bi­li­ty of such a situa­ti­on alo­ne would under­mi­ne the foun­da­ti­ons of the rule of law. The abso­lu­te sta­tus of the pro­hi­bi­ti­on of tor­tu­re can­not be cal­led into ques­ti­on within, but only at the expen­se of the demo­cra­tic con­sti­tu­tio­nal sta­te. The abso­lu­te pro­hi­bi­ti­on of tor­tu­re sepa­ra­tes demo­cra­tic con­sti­tu­tio­nal sta­tes from tota­li­ta­ri­an regimes, in who­se legal sys­tem and ruler­ship tor­tu­re is wide­spread. Tor­tu­re thus repres­ents an attack on a legal asset that is not rela­ti­ve, but abso­lut­e­ly wort­hy of pro­tec­tion. The pro­hi­bi­ti­on of tor­tu­re does not allow any excep­ti­ons – not even in the case of a public emer­gen­cy that threa­tens the life of the nati­on – and basi­cal­ly excludes any balan­cing with other legal inte­rests. „[2]

Maus­feld illus­tra­tes in his artic­le, among other things, the plan­ned use of white tor­tu­re in Guan­tá­na­mo, Abu Ghraib and Bagram.

What does the Rome Sta­tu­te say?

Accor­ding to Artic­le 7 Para­graph 1 of the Rome Sta­tu­te of the Inter­na­tio­nal Cri­mi­nal Court of July 17, 1998, the fol­lo­wing appli­es especially:

Artic­le 7
Cri­mes against humanity

1. For the pur­po­se of this Sta­tu­te, „crime against huma­ni­ty“ means any of the fol­lo­wing acts when com­mit­ted as part of a wide­spread or sys­te­ma­tic attack direc­ted against any civi­li­an popu­la­ti­on, with know­ledge of the attack:

(a) Mur­der;

(b) Exter­mi­na­ti­on;

© Ens­lavement;

(d) Depor­ta­ti­on or for­ci­b­le trans­fer of population;

(e)  Impri­son­ment  or  other  seve­re  depri­va­ti­on  of  phy­si­cal  liber­ty  in  vio­la­ti­on  of  fun­da­men­tal  rules  of   inter­na­tio­nal law;

(f) Tor­tu­re;

(g) Rape, sexu­al slavery, enforced pro­sti­tu­ti­on, forced pregnan­cy, enforced ste­ri­liza­ti­on, or any other form  of sexu­al vio­lence of com­pa­ra­ble gravity;

(h) Per­se­cu­ti­on against any iden­ti­fia­ble group or coll­ec­ti­vi­ty on poli­ti­cal, racial, natio­nal, eth­nic, cul­tu­ral,  reli­gious,  gen­der  as  defi­ned  in  para­graph  3,  or  other  grounds  that  are  uni­ver­sal­ly  reco­gni­zed  as   imper­mis­si­ble  under  inter­na­tio­nal  law,  in  con­nec­tion  with  any  act  refer­red  to  in  this  para­graph  or   any crime within the juris­dic­tion of the Court;

(i) Enforced dis­ap­pearance of persons;

(j) The crime of apartheid;

(k) Other inhu­ma­ne acts of a simi­lar cha­rac­ter inten­tio­nal­ly caus­ing gre­at suf­fe­ring, or serious inju­ry to body or to men­tal or phy­si­cal health.“ [3]

The­re are many examp­les of cri­mes against humanity

In addi­ti­on to the curr­ent­ly par­ti­cu­lar­ly pre­sent topic of com­pul­so­ry vac­ci­na­ti­on through the back door, the Coro­na inves­ti­ga­ti­ve com­mit­tee (Coro­na-Unter­su­chungs­aus­schuss) also ela­bo­ra­ted on other pos­si­ble cri­mi­nal offen­ses for cri­mes against huma­ni­ty, such as depri­va­ti­on of per­so­nal free­dom due to lock­downs and qua­ran­ti­ne mea­su­res, dama­ge to health due to post­po­ned ope­ra­ti­ons, dis­cri­mi­na­ti­on against social groups (e.g. per­se­cu­ti­on of Doc­tors who have issued mask cer­ti­fi­ca­tes), psy­cho­lo­gi­cal tor­tu­re (e.g. child­birth or school les­sons only with mask wea­ring, per­cep­ti­on mono­po­ly, thre­at of job loss or death) and other serious rest­ric­tions on fun­da­men­tal rights.

It is recom­men­ded to have a look at the form lin­ked by the Coro­na Inves­ti­ga­ti­on Com­mit­tee (Coro­na-Unter­su­chungs­aus­schuss)[4], the cri­mi­nal offen­ses[5] and the video of the mee­ting.[6]

[1] , zuletzt auf­ge­rufen am 06.10.2021

[2] „Psy­cho­logie, ‚wei­ße Fol­ter‘ und die Ver­ant­wort­lich­keit von Wis­sen­schaft­lern“ in „Psy­cho­lo­gi­sche Rund­schau“, 60 (4), S. 229 – 240, hier S.230. See under , last time cal­led up 06.10.2021

[3] Cour Péna­le Inter­na­tio­na­le / Inter­na­tio­nal Cri­mi­nal „Court Rome Sta­tu­te of the Inter­na­tio­nal Cri­mi­nal Court“ at „icc​-cp​.int“. See under https://​www​.icc​-cpi​.int/​r​e​s​o​u​r​c​e​-​l​i​b​r​a​r​y​/​d​o​c​u​m​e​n​t​s​/​r​s​-​e​n​g​.​pdf, last time cal­led up 09.10.2021

[4] See under https://​2020​news​.de/​w​p​-​c​o​n​t​e​n​t​/​u​p​l​o​a​d​s​/​2​0​2​0​/​1​2​/​F​o​r​m​u​l​a​r​_​f​u​e​r​_​S​t​r​a​f​a​n​z​e​i​g​e​.​d​ocx

[5] See under‑2.pdf

[6] See under https://​ody​see​.com/​@​W​e​l​t​f​r​i​e​d​e​n​.​T​V​:​c​/​D​e​n​H​a​a​g​_​V​e​r​b​r​e​c​h​e​n​_​g​e​g​e​n​_​M​e​n​s​c​h​l​i​c​h​k​e​i​t:1

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Benachrichtige mich bei
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments